BIPP: Cultural symbolism of the wall: from Texas to Berlin
April 4, 2019
With mounting pressure to seal off the U.S.-Mexico border and a recent threat by President Donald Trump of cutting off aid to several Central American countries, the United States has moved towards a self-imposed state of isolation, the likes of which have few historical counterparts. Facing uncertain social and economic consequences, the fallout of this widening rift has been fiercely debated. The Berlin Wall, which divided East from West Germany for over 28 years, may provide a unique case study to reflect on the potential physical, psychological, and social ramifications of this divide. Indeed, while the wall’s destruction in 1989 seems to be a distant memory, the aftermath of this separation remains omnipresent in contemporary German society. Furthermore, by approaching the border crisis from a historical lens, it is possible to gain insight into the broader cultural effects the construction of a wall can have.
After World War II, when Berlin was separated into four zones, monitored by the United States, France, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union, Germany became ideologically and socioeconomically polarized. As the Allied West aligned itself with a capitalist economic system and the values of democracy, the Soviet-controlled East shifted towards communism. The construction of the wall in 1961 solidified this isolation and soon came to represent the front lines of the Cold War conflict. During the strife, thousands of East Germans attempted to flee to the West, both successfully and unsuccessfully. In 1989, facing civil unrest and the inevitable downfall of the USSR, the wall would be gradually demolished, allowing for the start of reunification. But even after several decades, the process of reunification is ongoing, as weaving together the two disparate fragments has proven a relentlessly challenging task.
Though remnants of the wall have been almost completely expunged from the physical landscape of the country, it has left an indelible mark on the national psyche. Indeed, in German, the saying “Mauer im Kopf” or “Wall in mind” restates the continued relevance of the barrier on modern life. With East Germans earning less while having fewer representatives in social and economic spheres, some have questioned whether the fall of the wall has brought about more harm than good.
Looking back on the current situation facing the United States, it becomes clear that the border wall, whether expanded or not, can have profound impacts on the trajectory of North American life. After the Berlin Wall fell, Germany encountered an identity crisis, as the term “Die Wende,” or “the turn,” was used to encompass the process of change and integration that followed. In this same way, the United States faces a crucial turning point. The current volatile geopolitical landscape demands a critical reevaluation of policies that could lead to unrest, as policymakers must grapple with the emerging mass human diaspora around the world. Though there is a fundamental difference between the two barriers, as the Berlin Wall was designed to keep East Germans insulated from the West and Trump’s border wall stands to stymy the rapid influx of immigrants into the United States, both represent concrete, intractable solutions to complex and multifaceted problems. If the Berlin Wall can teach us any lesson, it is that building walls may only exacerbate the deep-seated issues at the heart of these crises. While the implications of closing the border remain to be seen, reflecting on historical examples such as the Berlin Wall makes it clear that the chasm created by a wall, even if only temporary, may inflict permanent psychological, social, and economic scars on a nation.
Yiwei • Apr 12, 2019 at 11:19 am
Hi Kurtis,
Thank you for your comments. I appreciate your view on this issue and yes we need to recognize the fundamental difference between the two walls here. However, we aimed to explore the psychological aspect of having walls in the modern liberal world and its ramifications on the mass population in this article and we concluded there are indeed, aside from political implications, striking similarities in both cases.
Thanks again for your comments and feedback!
Yiwei
Kurtis • Apr 5, 2019 at 4:41 pm
There is a fundamental difference between the two, which is why the two walls should not be compared.
The Berlin Wall/ iron curtain was built to keep the citizens of the Soviet Union in and under the oppression of the communist state. This was heavily guarded, and many people lost their lives trying to access the free world from the USSR. This is much like the 38th parallel which divides North and South Korea.
The wall along the southern border of the United States is not meant to keep to keep people in. It is meant to force people to come to the country in a legal manner through the appropriate boarder crossing. This concept of a boarder wall is used throughout the world to control the boarders of the countries that built them, thus providing security.
In the end, we need to remember that this is not a political issue, but one of national security. There is no reason that a land boarder should not be just as secure as an air or sea boarder, and that there is no reason for someone not to come through a legal port of entry.
I encourage you all to have proper political discourse with people of different viewpoints because listening and understanding other viewpoints is important when moving forward in the political landscape.