Letter to the Editor
February 21, 2020
How is it that The Bucknellian has so much time and energy to dedicate to the Bucknell Program for American Leadership and Citizenship (BPALC) when we bring speakers to campus who are situated on the political right, but then it is utterly silent when we bring speakers on the other side of the ideological spectrum?
Anyone who suspects we are exaggerating should check the comparative amount of Bucknellian attention given to Heather Mac Donald and Jennifer Silva. The former — a conservative New York Times best-selling author on crime, politics in the university and other topics — was the subject last fall of several full-length news stories and seemingly endless opinion pieces. Nearly every article pilloried her in inflammatory, unedifying terms, though it was pretty clear there was a large student audience interested in hearing her (she easily filled Bucknell Hall). The latter — a liberal sociologist and former Bucknell professor who has written a lot about youth and the American poor — was completely ignored by The Bucknellian, which couldn’t be bothered to dedicate one drop of ink to noting her participation in two events on Jan. 22-23 that also drew large numbers of Bucknell students — probably more in total even than Mac Donald drew.
One of the events Silva participated in was a dialogue/debate with one of the signatories to this letter that illustrated how scholarly discussions across ideological lines can be productive when the participants commit to collegiality and agree to forego the kind of name-calling that so characterized The Bucknellian’s coverage of Mac Donald’s visit. Given that much of that coverage also involved attacking BPALC in scurrilous terms for its supposed commitment to denying space for any but conservative voices, you’d think an event in which the falsity of The Bucknellian’s claims was made manifest would have been something of interest to a campus newspaper.
Yet Silva got no attention at all in the pages of The Bucknellian, even though, during the two weeks following her visit, the news cycle on campus was so slow that the paper had space to feature the following breaking stories, among others of similar gravity: “Student lectureship series to host Rainn Wilson” (Jan. 24) and “The importance of therapy dogs on college campuses” (Jan. 31). Are we seriously to believe that The Bucknellian thinks that such stories are more newsworthy than a visit by a scholar (and former Bucknellian) who just published a book, “We’re Still Here,” on poverty and political identity in central Pennsylvania that is receiving national attention and who brought somewhere in the neighborhood of one hundred enthusiastic Bucknell students out for two well-attended events?
Why was Silva’s visit to campus so carefully ignored by The Bucknellian, despite the evidence that many Bucknell students clearly found it noteworthy? We think we know the answer: The Bucknellian ignored her visit because of who invited her. If only she had been invited by an organization other than BPALC, we’d doubtless have seen a different attitude from The Bucknellian, as the paper rarely misses an opportunity to enthusiastically report on the steady stream of leftist speakers to campus. At least some on The Bucknellian staff evidently do not care for the idea of viewpoint diversity — one need only read the sneering way they refer to it to see that. And they really do not care for the fact that BPALC advocates strenuously for viewpoint diversity and argues that a university fit to be called a university requires it. The reason The Bucknellian prefers not to cover BPALC events when they involve speakers on the left (it’s not just Silva – the exact same thing happened last year when we invited Todd Gitlin and June Carbone, too) is because it knows such events pose a threat to its wild, hostile caricaturing of our group and its mission.
The truth is that BPALC is committed to hearing from all reasonable sides on serious issues. The Bucknellian’s actions might well make its readers suspect that it has quite different commitments.
BPALC Faculty Affiliates:
Richard Crago
William R. Gruver
Alexander Riley
Alfred K. Siewers
Janice Traflet
Rivka Ulmer
BPALC Student Associates:
Isabella Carrega
Joseph D’Angelo
Andrew Marinaccio
Manning Martus
Quentin • Jul 6, 2021 at 7:16 pm
Yup, of course. It’s that convenient right wing meme that they are so downtrodden and yet high minded and so full of freedom (TM). Right wing extremists may get canceled by colleges or Twitter, Facebook, etc. So what? They are private companies (except the state systems of course) and can do anything they want. if anyone should revere the sanctity of private property, it’s libertarians and conservatives like yourselves.
Republicans, on the other hand, actually craft and pass state and federal LAWS that impinge on the very real constitutional rights of Americans. Never hear a peep from you folks about the suppression of BDS and the laws requiring loyalty oaths to Israel and the like. Milton Friedman would love that, I bet. Boycotts are THE main expression of capitalism, don’t like something? Don’t buy it! Let the market decide.
You know why liberal students started protesting right-wing speakers? Because foolish right wing students invited THE most offensive people they could find! Not to share in a diversity of ideas and explore important topics but simply to inflame and ridicule, to mock the real pain of others, to minimize inconvenient truths and to offend. Again, not a peep about any of that.
Get real, wolves in sheep’s clothing.
Leigh Smart • Mar 2, 2020 at 5:57 pm
Bravo! Well said. The leftist professors at Bucknell do their students no favors navigating the real world in promoting victimhood and close-minded approach to critical thinking. Students are in a period of brain development that will influence them for decades. That adults in high education would manipulate their role from their own protected confines of a protected job that bears no resemblance to the real world is criminal.
Alexander Boyer • Feb 22, 2020 at 5:31 pm
If you can handle a debate of ideas why dont you think the people cant handle your name, Revere? If you’re at liberty to not show your name and instead constantly hide your ideology behind pseudonyms, then all of campus is also at liberty not to engage you.
Revere • Feb 22, 2020 at 11:11 am
The difference in dialogue between the authoritarians (whether fascist, socialist, communist or some other stripe) and the pro-liberty side is striking, but also explains the decisions on what to cover and how to cover it. The authoritarians can’t handle a debate on ideas, but have to resort to “ok boomer”, “racism” and “conservatives mad” comments. The left wants control of people in order to enrich and empower themselves and to do that they need to shut down anyone who might have a cognizant argument for freedom instead of collectivism.
emily • Feb 21, 2020 at 6:50 pm
blatant racism does not qualify as a “reasonable side”.
Publius • Feb 21, 2020 at 6:32 pm
conservatives mad
Alfred K Siewers • Feb 21, 2020 at 8:55 am
As a postscript to this letter, it’s worth noting that today’s Bucknellian did not cover the well-attended BPALC-sponsored Dreher-Sullivan dialogue on Tuesday in the ELC Forum, to which many in attendance from different perspectives and backgrounds responded positively. But it did cover the Humanities Center “Love and the Humanities” event, which only a “handful” of people attended, even spending column space on the food served and amiable pre-event conversation, while ignoring a probably better-attended event on a parallel topic, featuring a faculty panel on “Loneliness and the Four Loves,” sponsored by faith groups on campus. More column space was devoted to op-ed criticism of BPALC in the same issue, which has gotten so repetitive (and innaccurately one-sided) in theme it could just now be run weekly with the same text under different headlines. Bucknell’s values expressed in our university mission statement call for encouragement of “diverse perspectives.” Basic journalistic professionalism does the same.