A response to violence that America should listen to

Photo+Courtesy+of+Creative+Commons.
Back to Article
Back to Article

A response to violence that America should listen to

Photo Courtesy of Creative Commons.

Photo Courtesy of Creative Commons.

Photo Courtesy of Creative Commons.

Photo Courtesy of Creative Commons.

Lindsey Schwalm, Contributing Writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






In an era riddled by violence and chaos, I was relieved that somewhere when tragedy struck, action was immediately taken to prevent further catastrophe. Following the massacre of 50 people in two Christchurch mosques, New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern made several decisions to protect the safety of her citizens and take a firm stance against the radical violence that seems to be commonplace in our modern world. Her actions starkly contrast the reactions that the United States has had to similar instances of violence, and we should look to the Prime Minister’s bravery in order to confront our own struggles.

 

Ardern set the tone for all further discussion of the shooting by blatantly calling it a terrorist attack instead of simply referring to the perpetrator as a shooter. By classifying it a terrorist attack early on, Arden was able to start taking steps towards meaningful gun reform in which discussion of semi-automatic guns was on the table, and was able to launch an investigation into how this attack occurred. This investigation will examine every preventative measure that could have happened to stop the shooter and then will use that information to put legislation in place to ensure this will not happen again.

 

This may not seem too different from the U.S.’s reactions to shootings Orlando nightclub shooting, Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, or the shooting in Las Vegas – except in the United States, we are unable to call these shooters what they are: terrorists. By labeling this violence in this way, it limits the discussion on the shooter and focuses directly on the prevention of these tragedies and the condemning of hatred that fuels these acts of violence. By changing the discussion, I believe the United States could pull itself out of the cycle of violence we find ourselves in.

 

Another difference in New Zealand’s discussion on the shooting is that they are taking the focus away from the shooter and placing it onto the victims in order to prevent further tragedies. The Prime Minister vowed to never say the shooter’s name because she did not want to give him recognition or motivate others by giving him credit for the attack. This is very different from the United States, who will plaster the shooter’s name, face, and life story on every media platform. When media conglomerates broadcast the name of the terrorists, it draws focus away from the system that allows such incidents. New Zealand is coming up with solutions instead of trying to push the blame somewhere, and I believe that they will be much more effective at making a positive change to reduce the chance of future, horrible tragedies.

 

It is critical that the United States – and the rest of the world – deals with acts of terrorism head-on in a clear and productive fashion. The United States continues in the cycle of violence while, hopefully, the changes made in New Zealand regarding gun regulations and ownership will ensure this never happens again. To stop this cycle, we need to look to other countries as an example and learn from them and this pain.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
(Visited 48 times, 1 visits today)