The weekly student newspaper of Bucknell University

The Bucknellian

The weekly student newspaper of Bucknell University

The Bucknellian

The weekly student newspaper of Bucknell University

The Bucknellian

Bucknell receives high marks from ‘U.S. News & World Report 2024 Best Colleges’
Bucknell Student Government election winners share goals for upcoming year
Has Olivia Rodrigo entered a new era, or is GUTS just an extension of SOUR?
A Bucknellian’s guide to being Kenough

A Bucknellian’s guide to being Kenough

September 22, 2023

Bucknell’s Lopez wins State Museum of Pennsylvania Competition

Bucknell’s Lopez wins State Museum of Pennsylvania Competition

September 22, 2023

Platt and King torch opponents as Bison roll at Carnegie Mellon Women’s Tennis Invitational

Platt and King torch opponents as Bison roll at Carnegie Mellon Women’s Tennis Invitational

September 22, 2023

View All

Panel discusses potential election outcomes

Kerong Kelly
Contributing Writer

On Sept. 17, the Bucknell Institute for Public Policy (BIPP) hosted a panel discussion on the potential outcome of the 2012 presidential election. The panel was comprised of University professors who spoke about the opposing viewpoints of President Obama and Mitt Romney on issues like healthcare and immigration. Among the panel of speakers were Professors of Economics Chris Magee and Nancy White, Associate Professor of Political Science Scott Meinke and Associate Professors of Economics Gregory Krohn, Amy Wolaver and Paula Kazi.

Initially, Krohn compared the idea of the “fiscal cliff” to Wile E. Coyote’s adventurous cliff diving experience, where he narrowly missed hitting the sharp boulders at the base of the mountain. The visual representation of the cartoon clip was not only effective, but engaging for the audience.

“I thought it was a great event for learning about specific policies, and it was good to actually solidify what my positions were. I don’t think it actually changed what I would do, but it made me realize what an average voter might think,” Ben Dorman ’15 said.

Story continues below advertisement

Though the event was overall very informative for some, others thought it did not encompass enough of the two candidates’ viewpoints.

“I felt that they did not do a lot in getting us to know what the general application of these policies were or the general effect they might have,” Julius Kakwenzire ’16 said.

Even though time was limited for each presenter, the presentation covered a wide range of topics such as immigration and the misconceptions Americans have about it. Kazi spoke about myths such as immigrants being a drain on the federal government’s budget, and the negative immigrant influence on wages and the employment prospects of United States workers.

Toward the end of the presentation, the panel discussed the topic of voter ID laws in Pennsylvania.

“Generally, we have kids coming from affluent families. When they come here for classes, they see some of the benefits, like what tax revenues are used for,” Kazi said.

She believes that informed voting is of significant importance to this campus.

(Visited 83 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

The editorial board of The Bucknellian reserves the right to review all comments before they are posted on the website and remove any if deemed offensive, illegal or in bad taste. Comments left on our web pages are not necessarily in-line with the views expressed by the writer.
All The Bucknellian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *